Hatsune Miku

back to carrier pigeons?

it was always just one big ad campaign

Acceptable collateral to Hamas, who were using the hospital as a shield

so the bank robber was using human shields

probably because they support the actions or are so binary in their beliefs that there can’t be two bad guys

i wonder why this reuters article is being downvoted

That person was one of the hostages. don’t you find that a little suspicious that one of the hostages was found dead outside the hospital grounds?

i didn’t know israel is beheading people with garden hoes :o

I think mods should ban any account that argues points without reputable sources to back their claims. The amount of “they bombed hospitals” without evidence is pretty staggering.

There are more than two hostages. They’ve already found one of the previous hostages dead near the hospital grounds.

Wait until more footage comes through

they haven’t actually bombed al shifa, or any hospital for that matter.

well this community suddenly became very quiet.

And Israeli response to the massacre?

IDF hasn’t bombed any active hospital yet.

Israel’s extreme response is because Hamas killed roughly one thousand innocent lives and also captured civilian and military hostages. How do you get them back while responding to the attack?

I’m not buying anything the BBC says regarding this conflict. They have repeatedly had to apologise for flat-out lying during their reporting.

As BBC News covered initial reports that Israeli forces had entered Gaza’s main hospital, we said that “medical teams and Arab speakers” were being targeted. This was incorrect and misquoted a Reuters report. We should have said IDF forces included medical teams and Arabic speakers for this operation. We apologise for this error, which fell below our usual editorial standards. The correct version of events was broadcast minutes later and we apologised for the mistake on air later in the morning.

They also had the government warn them of their impartial reporting during an anti-semitic attack, where they claimed that the Jewish victim perpetuated the attack.

Oh, but there’s even more. In 2004, the former BBC Director of News commissioned a report into the impartiality of the BBC reporting on conflicts in the Middle East, particularly Israel-Palestine. The BBC spent £330,000 in legal costs (not including staff or VAT) contesting again and again the findings of the report, themselves refusing to publically release the report’s findings. Fighting in court repeatedly against activists for almost a decade to withhold the report findings is extremely suspicious.

The BBC’s history of being biased or misleading shows they cannot be trusted for news in the middle-east.

We can take a step back and ask why guns made of metal were anywhere near an MRI, but we can also ask where the IDF supposedly “found” the original guns.

Because without electricity, the MRI is off? Hospitals don’t tend to use MRIs during extraordinary crises due to power consumption.

Also of note is that the laptop shown at the end of the “uncut” al-Shifa video… Uses an Israeli power plug and displays an IDF soldier. The IDF later took the video down and re-uploaded it with that picture blurred.

Yes, in the video, they say that it was one of their captured soldiers. As for the power plug, I don’t see what that proves? The soldiers plugged in the laptop to view its contents? Hamas had an Israeli power bank? The main issue is that there were guns inside the hospital, which violates Article 19 of the Geneva Convention, which means that the hospital loses its immunity–that’s the problem worth noting here.

A planted gun? As in the IDF put it there?

and how do you get the hostages back and launch a counteroffensive because Hamas broke the ceasefire that was in place?

they’re actually in multiple

Even in an active warzone you cannot store military equipment (except medical aid, of course) in a hospital. Also the WD40 cans are IED’s, improvised explosive devices.