Looks like he bent a paper clip to restore the bounce to the clip that springs open to hold the keyboard up at an angle, which is better for your wrists than typing on it while it’s flat.
Looks like he bent a paper clip to restore the bounce to the clip that springs open to hold the keyboard up at an angle, which is better for your wrists than typing on it while it’s flat.


This was my introduction to this song, and for the longest time I thought it was original content.
The fact is this was my first, and now only, ever experience with Apple. I’ve never had development locked to the whims of a third party before. I had no idea they had the ability to lock me out of using it because the entire idea is absurd. The reason the analogy is not perfect is that no other company requires you to buy a new piece of their hardware every seven years to develop. I purchased for Apple the same way I buy the rest of my hardware: buy powerful hardware so it lasts a long time without needing to upgrade.
This is a problem entirely of Apple’s own making, exclusive to only Apple, and it’s a problem designed specifically to extract more money from people. That’s why it was my worst tech purchase ever, and one I will never repeat.
WTF. Do you work for Apple? What EVIDENCE do I have that I expected my hardware that I bought for over $3,000 to continue functioning until it died? My evidence is my experience with every piece of electronics I have ever owned from every other manufacturer up until that point.
I can still connect to Xbox Live on my Xbox 360, giving it a lifespan, so far, of 21 years.
Knowing what can be expected from Apple is exactly why I won’t ever buy an Apple product again, and warn anyone who mentions them that they’re buying a ticking time bomb and Apple holds the donator, which they will use for the explicit purpose of extracting more money from people, even while the hardware is still working.
Apple is also the ONLY company that charges an annual fee on TOP of their exorbitant hardware costs for the ability to develop apps for their hardware. They’re also the ONLY company that demands you own their brand of hardware to publish apps. Google doesn’t force developers to use a Chromebook to publish Android apps, and Microsoft doesn’t force developers to use a Windows machine to publish Windows apps. Samsung doesn’t demand you develop apps for the Samsung marketplace on a Samsung device.
This is literally only an issue with Apple, and it’s entirely of their own creation. Apple is unrestricted and blatant in their greed, and I’ve learned they’re not shy about it at all. I no longer participate in any of their ecosystems and never will again.
It’s simultaneously the shortest lifespan of any electronics I’ve ever purchased while also being the most expensive, by a considerable margin. Not a great combo no matter how you attempt to spin it.
Then I must have the model wrong - I’m traveling currently, and don’t have it with me. Whichever model it is, it does NOT have the option to update. I’m stuck on MacOS 15.7.5
A 2019 MacBook Pro, and for $3,000+ I was expecting to use it until it died - not until Apple decided I couldn’t use it anymore. I personally don’t consider less than seven years to be “a very long time,” especially when paying over $3,000.
Linux is great, but it won’t allow me to use it for the sole purpose I bought it - publishing iOS apps.
I was told doing so ran the risk of getting your published iOS application blacklisted if Apple detected you were circumventing their greed, so it wasn’t worth the risk.
The 2019 MacBook Pro that I paid $3,000+ for after taxes and shipping, but looking at the hardware specs I was mistaken on the core count. It has a i9 Intel CPU with 8 physical cores, and 16 logical. More than enough power for software development if Apple wasn’t such a greedy entity.
I bought a MacBook Pro for iOS development. It was alright until Apple decided to exclude it from future OS updates, preventing me from using it for it’s sole purpose, and forcing me to either buy a new one or stop developing iOS apps. Guess which one I chose. There is nothing wrong with the hardware, it’s still got a 2TB SSD, 16GB of RAM and 16-core CPU but apparently Apple thought they could make more money off of me by intentionally barring it from updates to force me to buy a new one, rather than simply allowing me to install MacOS updates. They were wrong.
Edit: 8 physical cores, 16 logical


I stand corrected. My sincere apologies.


Reminder that this is a disingenuous portrayal of events.
The reason why Anthropic can’t supply the US military, or any part of the US government, is because they objected to Claude being used to choose military targets and refused to support how the fascists were using it. They are suing for the non-military branches of the government to be allowed to use the technology again after the fascists retaliated for their refusal to be in bed with fascists.


Tell me you’ve never purposefully created art using AI without telling me.


Debating, not arguing. Not a troll. Engaging in the topic, and you just don’t like to hear views opposed to yours. I only resort to ad hominem attacks when they’re used against me. You started the disrespect in what was otherwise a respectful conversation. It is you who is a dick. I’m sure you’re aware and enjoying it very much.


You sound like that bird that sticks their heads in the sand whenever they hear something that scares them.


I don’t know, do artists credit Hewlett Packard for the computer they used, or GIMP for the software they use? Is it normal to credit all the tools used when someone makes art?


Because it’s a topic about separating creations from the creator. It’s perfectly topical and cromulent.


It doesn’t operate in a vacuum. It’s a tool. There is an operator of the tool, and it takes skill to get the output desired.
Thanks for proving my point, though.


Thanks for proving my point.
No one had the idea, tweaked the input, or carefully wrote a prompt. The person operating the tool doesn’t exist, you’re right.
OPEN WIDE FOR SOME SOCCER!!!