• Aussieiuszko@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yeah, nah.

    Petition these people:

    https://www.collectiveshout.org/partners

    Collective Shout is sustained by a small number of Australian partners. These are not big groups, and would quickly pull funding under any sort of pressure.

    Collective Shout has a deep history with Christofascism and TERFs, so highlighting those angles is the way to go to get them pariahed. Once CS is out of the picture, we can work on undoing the damage they did.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Petitioning people to do something that is against their entire purpose doesn’t seem like it would be effective.

      • hikaru755@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think the idea is to pressure the partners of Collective Shout, per the url in the comment. Those might not necessarily agree with what they’re doing in this case, and if they see it’s making waves, reconsider their partnership.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Looking at the partners on that page, I think at least half of them are more than okay with Collective Shout’s actions.

    • Pamasich@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is incredibly shortsighted.

      If you get Collective Shout to stop, another group might pick up where they left off.

      The problem needs to be fixed, what you’re suggesting is just making the people currently abusing it stop doing so. That’s not a long term solution.

      • Aussieiuszko@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        No it’s incredibly idiotic to do otherwise.

        You don’t fight a fire while the arsonist is still setting it on fire.

        • Pamasich@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Except they’re not fighting the fire here, they’re taking away the arsonist’s flamethrowser so he can’t continue making the fire. Without that flamethrower, the arsonist can’t do shit.

          Fighting the fire would be petitioning Steam, but the target is the payment processors that pressured Steam on request of Collective Shout.

          • Aussieiuszko@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Fighting the fire happens after stopping the person lighting the fire. Focus on the immediate threat, don’t get distracted by the lofty long term.