Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoJudge backs AI firm over use of copyrighted bookswww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up1197arrow-down16
arrow-up1191arrow-down1external-linkJudge backs AI firm over use of copyrighted bookswww.bbc.comDavriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square58fedilink
minus-squarebob_omb_battlefield@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 days agoYeah, I guess the debate is which is the lesser evil. I didn’t make the original comment but I think this is what they were getting at.
minus-squareGrimy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-22 days agoYes precisely. I don’t see a situation where the actual content creators get paid. We either get open source ai, or we get closed ai where the big ai companies and copyright companies make bank. I think people are having huge knee jerk reactions and end up supporting companies like Disney, Universal Music and Google.
minus-squareNomad Scry@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·2 days agoAbsolutely. The current copyright system is terrible but an AI replacement of creators is worse.
Yeah, I guess the debate is which is the lesser evil. I didn’t make the original comment but I think this is what they were getting at.
Yes precisely.
I don’t see a situation where the actual content creators get paid.
We either get open source ai, or we get closed ai where the big ai companies and copyright companies make bank.
I think people are having huge knee jerk reactions and end up supporting companies like Disney, Universal Music and Google.
Absolutely. The current copyright system is terrible but an AI replacement of creators is worse.