1984@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 days agoAdguard DNS: Our investigation into the suspicious pressure on Archive.todayadguard-dns.ioexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1393arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1391arrow-down1external-linkAdguard DNS: Our investigation into the suspicious pressure on Archive.todayadguard-dns.io1984@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 days agomessage-square30fedilinkfile-text
I feel like more people should know about this, specially the tech-native Lemmy audience that may be using Adguard DNS.
minus-squareNollij@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·12 days agoNot OP, but the most obvious and popular alternative to Adguard DNS is a (self-hosted) Pi-hole. That setup is effectively protected from such attacks, in no small part because it’s self-hosted.
minus-squareりん〜@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·12 days agoI’m self-hosting AdGuard Home, will i be affected?
minus-squarerhabarba@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·12 days agoUnless you use unbound with it, yes.
Not OP, but the most obvious and popular alternative to Adguard DNS is a (self-hosted) Pi-hole. That setup is effectively protected from such attacks, in no small part because it’s self-hosted.
I’m self-hosting AdGuard Home, will i be affected?
Unless you use unbound with it, yes.