You’re a moral objectivist, too? Shall I start calling you Ms Rand?

You don’t need objective truth to hate Trump. You can just subjectively believe rape is wrong. Are you saying you don’t have a subjective opinion against rape?

Are you saying the Trump administration are poststructuralists who believe everything is open to interpretation?

But science is “objective” to the extent that experiments are repeatable by any any given person following the same methodology will be the same results.

No, the beliefs of the researcher are a confounding variable in any experiment. This is called observer bias. Most researchers believe in disputed ideas like personhood, spacetime, and objects, which influence their scientific conclusions. This isn’t a bug, it’s a feature. Science exists within our socially constructed world. A truly objective epistemology would be incomprehensible to us, because we are not objectively perceiving or thinking creatures.

questions the objectivity or stability of the various interpretive structures that are posited by structuralism and considers them to be constituted by broader systems of power.

Calling people who disagree with you mentally ill is one of the reasons poststructuralists say you’re oppressing them.

There are no undeniable facts. Science doesn’t prove anything objectively, it merely provides evidence to support or reject certain ideas.

Their “issue” is that they think it doesn’t benefit them personally, and they think everything ought to be about them.