Will we ever be rid of this insufferable twat?
Will we ever be rid of this insufferable twat?
Is this why he wanted to change the bestality rules in the FBI?
You joke but some high ranking FBI official probably fucked a goat and they had to retrospectively change the rule to protect him…
You know…I watched that clip and for the first half I couldn’t stop laughing. Granted, I was high as fuck…but the comedic timing was uncanny throughout the whole interaction.
But once Kash explained himself, it sort of made sense. I hate myself for saying that…but I said it, so there.
Thing is, I’m not sure you can really be a victim of bestiality. Bestiality is sexually abusing an animal, and if the human is being coerced, they are being sexually abused - by the person who is coercing this.
So a victim of bestiality properly adjudicated wouldn’t even have anything on their record, I should think.
So what the fuck?
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Thing is, I’m not sure you can really be a victim of bestiality. Bestiality is sexually abusing an animal, and if the human is being coerced, they are being sexually abused - by the person who is coercing this.
So a victim of bestiality properly adjudicated wouldn’t even have anything on their record, I should think.
So what the fuck?
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
…he talked about their own fucking canine units being involved in this. Even if somehow some prospective FBI employee was coerced into committing beastiality…do you really want people who can be manipulated into actions like that to be working at the FBI.
Nothing he said makes a single bit of sense if you actually think about it, it can only be interpreted as them being okay with beastiality or them being okay with easily compromisable FBI agents…do you really think either of those options are acceptable?
…he talked about their own fucking canine units being involved in this. Even if somehow some prospective FBI employee was coerced into committing beastiality…do you really want people who can be manipulated into actions like that to be working at the FBI.
Nothing he said makes a single bit of sense if you actually think about it, it can only be interpreted as them being okay with beastiality or them being okay with easily compromisable FBI agents…do you really think either of those options are acceptable?
You know…I watched that clip and for the first half I couldn’t stop laughing. Granted, I was high as fuck…but the comedic timing was uncanny throughout the whole interaction.
But once Kash explained himself, it sort of made sense. I hate myself for saying that…but I said it, so there.
Thing is, I’m not sure you can really be a victim of bestiality. Bestiality is sexually abusing an animal, and if the human is being coerced, they are being sexually abused - by the person who is coercing this.
So a victim of bestiality properly adjudicated wouldn’t even have anything on their record, I should think.
So what the fuck?
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Thing is, I’m not sure you can really be a victim of bestiality. Bestiality is sexually abusing an animal, and if the human is being coerced, they are being sexually abused - by the person who is coercing this.
So a victim of bestiality properly adjudicated wouldn’t even have anything on their record, I should think.
So what the fuck?
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
…he talked about their own fucking canine units being involved in this. Even if somehow some prospective FBI employee was coerced into committing beastiality…do you really want people who can be manipulated into actions like that to be working at the FBI.
Nothing he said makes a single bit of sense if you actually think about it, it can only be interpreted as them being okay with beastiality or them being okay with easily compromisable FBI agents…do you really think either of those options are acceptable?
…he talked about their own fucking canine units being involved in this. Even if somehow some prospective FBI employee was coerced into committing beastiality…do you really want people who can be manipulated into actions like that to be working at the FBI.
Nothing he said makes a single bit of sense if you actually think about it, it can only be interpreted as them being okay with beastiality or them being okay with easily compromisable FBI agents…do you really think either of those options are acceptable?
You joke but some high ranking FBI official probably fucked a goat and they had to retrospectively change the rule to protect him…
You know…I watched that clip and for the first half I couldn’t stop laughing. Granted, I was high as fuck…but the comedic timing was uncanny throughout the whole interaction.
But once Kash explained himself, it sort of made sense. I hate myself for saying that…but I said it, so there.
Thing is, I’m not sure you can really be a victim of bestiality. Bestiality is sexually abusing an animal, and if the human is being coerced, they are being sexually abused - by the person who is coercing this.
So a victim of bestiality properly adjudicated wouldn’t even have anything on their record, I should think.
So what the fuck?
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Thing is, I’m not sure you can really be a victim of bestiality. Bestiality is sexually abusing an animal, and if the human is being coerced, they are being sexually abused - by the person who is coercing this.
So a victim of bestiality properly adjudicated wouldn’t even have anything on their record, I should think.
So what the fuck?
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
…he talked about their own fucking canine units being involved in this. Even if somehow some prospective FBI employee was coerced into committing beastiality…do you really want people who can be manipulated into actions like that to be working at the FBI.
Nothing he said makes a single bit of sense if you actually think about it, it can only be interpreted as them being okay with beastiality or them being okay with easily compromisable FBI agents…do you really think either of those options are acceptable?
…he talked about their own fucking canine units being involved in this. Even if somehow some prospective FBI employee was coerced into committing beastiality…do you really want people who can be manipulated into actions like that to be working at the FBI.
Nothing he said makes a single bit of sense if you actually think about it, it can only be interpreted as them being okay with beastiality or them being okay with easily compromisable FBI agents…do you really think either of those options are acceptable?
You know…I watched that clip and for the first half I couldn’t stop laughing. Granted, I was high as fuck…but the comedic timing was uncanny throughout the whole interaction.
But once Kash explained himself, it sort of made sense. I hate myself for saying that…but I said it, so there.
Thing is, I’m not sure you can really be a victim of bestiality. Bestiality is sexually abusing an animal, and if the human is being coerced, they are being sexually abused - by the person who is coercing this.
So a victim of bestiality properly adjudicated wouldn’t even have anything on their record, I should think.
So what the fuck?
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Thing is, I’m not sure you can really be a victim of bestiality. Bestiality is sexually abusing an animal, and if the human is being coerced, they are being sexually abused - by the person who is coercing this.
So a victim of bestiality properly adjudicated wouldn’t even have anything on their record, I should think.
So what the fuck?
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
…he talked about their own fucking canine units being involved in this. Even if somehow some prospective FBI employee was coerced into committing beastiality…do you really want people who can be manipulated into actions like that to be working at the FBI.
Nothing he said makes a single bit of sense if you actually think about it, it can only be interpreted as them being okay with beastiality or them being okay with easily compromisable FBI agents…do you really think either of those options are acceptable?
…he talked about their own fucking canine units being involved in this. Even if somehow some prospective FBI employee was coerced into committing beastiality…do you really want people who can be manipulated into actions like that to be working at the FBI.
Nothing he said makes a single bit of sense if you actually think about it, it can only be interpreted as them being okay with beastiality or them being okay with easily compromisable FBI agents…do you really think either of those options are acceptable?
Is this why he wanted to change the bestality rules in the FBI?
You joke but some high ranking FBI official probably fucked a goat and they had to retrospectively change the rule to protect him…
You know…I watched that clip and for the first half I couldn’t stop laughing. Granted, I was high as fuck…but the comedic timing was uncanny throughout the whole interaction.
But once Kash explained himself, it sort of made sense. I hate myself for saying that…but I said it, so there.
Thing is, I’m not sure you can really be a victim of bestiality. Bestiality is sexually abusing an animal, and if the human is being coerced, they are being sexually abused - by the person who is coercing this.
So a victim of bestiality properly adjudicated wouldn’t even have anything on their record, I should think.
So what the fuck?
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Thing is, I’m not sure you can really be a victim of bestiality. Bestiality is sexually abusing an animal, and if the human is being coerced, they are being sexually abused - by the person who is coercing this.
So a victim of bestiality properly adjudicated wouldn’t even have anything on their record, I should think.
So what the fuck?
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
…he talked about their own fucking canine units being involved in this. Even if somehow some prospective FBI employee was coerced into committing beastiality…do you really want people who can be manipulated into actions like that to be working at the FBI.
Nothing he said makes a single bit of sense if you actually think about it, it can only be interpreted as them being okay with beastiality or them being okay with easily compromisable FBI agents…do you really think either of those options are acceptable?
…he talked about their own fucking canine units being involved in this. Even if somehow some prospective FBI employee was coerced into committing beastiality…do you really want people who can be manipulated into actions like that to be working at the FBI.
Nothing he said makes a single bit of sense if you actually think about it, it can only be interpreted as them being okay with beastiality or them being okay with easily compromisable FBI agents…do you really think either of those options are acceptable?
You know…I watched that clip and for the first half I couldn’t stop laughing. Granted, I was high as fuck…but the comedic timing was uncanny throughout the whole interaction.
But once Kash explained himself, it sort of made sense. I hate myself for saying that…but I said it, so there.
Thing is, I’m not sure you can really be a victim of bestiality. Bestiality is sexually abusing an animal, and if the human is being coerced, they are being sexually abused - by the person who is coercing this.
So a victim of bestiality properly adjudicated wouldn’t even have anything on their record, I should think.
So what the fuck?
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Thing is, I’m not sure you can really be a victim of bestiality. Bestiality is sexually abusing an animal, and if the human is being coerced, they are being sexually abused - by the person who is coercing this.
So a victim of bestiality properly adjudicated wouldn’t even have anything on their record, I should think.
So what the fuck?
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
…he talked about their own fucking canine units being involved in this. Even if somehow some prospective FBI employee was coerced into committing beastiality…do you really want people who can be manipulated into actions like that to be working at the FBI.
Nothing he said makes a single bit of sense if you actually think about it, it can only be interpreted as them being okay with beastiality or them being okay with easily compromisable FBI agents…do you really think either of those options are acceptable?
…he talked about their own fucking canine units being involved in this. Even if somehow some prospective FBI employee was coerced into committing beastiality…do you really want people who can be manipulated into actions like that to be working at the FBI.
Nothing he said makes a single bit of sense if you actually think about it, it can only be interpreted as them being okay with beastiality or them being okay with easily compromisable FBI agents…do you really think either of those options are acceptable?
You joke but some high ranking FBI official probably fucked a goat and they had to retrospectively change the rule to protect him…
You know…I watched that clip and for the first half I couldn’t stop laughing. Granted, I was high as fuck…but the comedic timing was uncanny throughout the whole interaction.
But once Kash explained himself, it sort of made sense. I hate myself for saying that…but I said it, so there.
Thing is, I’m not sure you can really be a victim of bestiality. Bestiality is sexually abusing an animal, and if the human is being coerced, they are being sexually abused - by the person who is coercing this.
So a victim of bestiality properly adjudicated wouldn’t even have anything on their record, I should think.
So what the fuck?
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Thing is, I’m not sure you can really be a victim of bestiality. Bestiality is sexually abusing an animal, and if the human is being coerced, they are being sexually abused - by the person who is coercing this.
So a victim of bestiality properly adjudicated wouldn’t even have anything on their record, I should think.
So what the fuck?
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
…he talked about their own fucking canine units being involved in this. Even if somehow some prospective FBI employee was coerced into committing beastiality…do you really want people who can be manipulated into actions like that to be working at the FBI.
Nothing he said makes a single bit of sense if you actually think about it, it can only be interpreted as them being okay with beastiality or them being okay with easily compromisable FBI agents…do you really think either of those options are acceptable?
…he talked about their own fucking canine units being involved in this. Even if somehow some prospective FBI employee was coerced into committing beastiality…do you really want people who can be manipulated into actions like that to be working at the FBI.
Nothing he said makes a single bit of sense if you actually think about it, it can only be interpreted as them being okay with beastiality or them being okay with easily compromisable FBI agents…do you really think either of those options are acceptable?
You know…I watched that clip and for the first half I couldn’t stop laughing. Granted, I was high as fuck…but the comedic timing was uncanny throughout the whole interaction.
But once Kash explained himself, it sort of made sense. I hate myself for saying that…but I said it, so there.
Thing is, I’m not sure you can really be a victim of bestiality. Bestiality is sexually abusing an animal, and if the human is being coerced, they are being sexually abused - by the person who is coercing this.
So a victim of bestiality properly adjudicated wouldn’t even have anything on their record, I should think.
So what the fuck?
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Thing is, I’m not sure you can really be a victim of bestiality. Bestiality is sexually abusing an animal, and if the human is being coerced, they are being sexually abused - by the person who is coercing this.
So a victim of bestiality properly adjudicated wouldn’t even have anything on their record, I should think.
So what the fuck?
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
I’m generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.
However, I’m also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.
I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.
They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
Arousal is a physical response, and entirely involuntary. Yes, a victim can show an arousal response. They are still a victim, and deserve compassion and support.
…he talked about their own fucking canine units being involved in this. Even if somehow some prospective FBI employee was coerced into committing beastiality…do you really want people who can be manipulated into actions like that to be working at the FBI.
Nothing he said makes a single bit of sense if you actually think about it, it can only be interpreted as them being okay with beastiality or them being okay with easily compromisable FBI agents…do you really think either of those options are acceptable?
…he talked about their own fucking canine units being involved in this. Even if somehow some prospective FBI employee was coerced into committing beastiality…do you really want people who can be manipulated into actions like that to be working at the FBI.
Nothing he said makes a single bit of sense if you actually think about it, it can only be interpreted as them being okay with beastiality or them being okay with easily compromisable FBI agents…do you really think either of those options are acceptable?
jfc LOL
jfc LOL
Why not party in the locker room at the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show? After all, he had already screwed the pooch.
Why not party in the locker room at the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show? After all, he had already screwed the pooch.
Dog on the right looks concerned.
Dog on the right looks concerned.
What did he do to those poor doggies? 😥
What did he do to those poor doggies? 😥
🤡
🤡
Caught paying stud fees from official funds
