return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 hours agoMeta Removes Face-Recognition System From Its Smart Glasses, Is Mad About itgizmodo.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1106arrow-down10
arrow-up1106arrow-down1external-linkMeta Removes Face-Recognition System From Its Smart Glasses, Is Mad About itgizmodo.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 hours agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squarelepinkainen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down2·3 hours agoWhy can’t a company do smart glasses with self-hostable or fully local processing? I’d love a pair but fuck streaming everything I see to a random dude in Nigeria
minus-squarevery_well_lost@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34·3 hours agoWell for one thing, it’s creepy and the people around you don’t want to be passively recorded 24/7. Remember Google Glass? Its users were called “glassholes” for a reason.
minus-squarestoy@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 hours agoSadly, Meta’s glasses is less obvious, so that term is harder to use accurately.
minus-squareExLisper@lemmy.curiana.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 hours agoBecause recording people without their consent is creepy AF.
Why can’t a company do smart glasses with self-hostable or fully local processing?
I’d love a pair but fuck streaming everything I see to a random dude in Nigeria
Well for one thing, it’s creepy and the people around you don’t want to be passively recorded 24/7.
Remember Google Glass? Its users were called “glassholes” for a reason.
Sadly, Meta’s glasses is less obvious, so that term is harder to use accurately.
Because recording people without their consent is creepy AF.