• too_high_for_this@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    People can report their own deductions, too. It’s just not worth it for most people.

    The problem is that the IRS “doesn’t have the resources” to audit corporations and millionaires. They basically only audit small business owners.

    Edit for sarcasm quotes

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Even that though, you can only deduct part of your living expenses. There is no food deduction afaik, there is no deduction for insurance as far as I know.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Most of us also pay a much higher proportion of our income in sales taxes. Businesses are exempt from such taxes; they are only paid by the end user.

        • too_high_for_this@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s absolutely not true. Businesses pay sales taxes, too. Nonprofits/churches/etc are exempt, but otherwise, every transaction is taxed.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            No, that’s incorrect. I am very well aware of this. Businesses only have to pay sales taxes on purchases for which they are the end user. They’ll pay sales taxes on their office supplies and services provided to the business. But manufacturers do not have to pay sales taxes on the raw materials they purchase. Retailers do not pay sales taxes on wholesale purchases they make for resale. Only the end-user pays the sales tax on a purchase.

            I work with a couple vendors that do not collect sales tax at all. They only sell B2B, and they only sell to businesses who provide them with a sales tax exemption certificate.

            What you are describing is more akin to Europe’s VAT system. Still, under VAT, everyone in the chain pays VAT, and each vendor remits the collected VAT to the tax authority. But, the business-buyer reclaims that VAT from the tax authority if they are not the end-user of the purchased product. Everyone but the end user can reclaim their VAT payment.

    • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Which is ass backwards. Audit those with the highest amounts and they made way more money. It’s proven it worked that way until they cut funding for it

    • jtrek@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m pretty sure I read that auditing the wealthy is a huge profit center for the IRS, because they find people who aren’t paying what’s owed. Naturally conservatives (of any party) hate this and gut it whenever possible

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Auditing in general is profitable, but it’s mostly due to it being automated for people that aren’t making 7 figures. Auditing the not absurdly wealthy is also generally a positive revenue. Auditing the extremely wealthy tends to not be a great net benefit as the costs of lawyers and court time outweighs the settlement check at the end. There’s an argument to be made it’s worth the cost to ensure the ultra wealthy do actually pay though.

        • jtrek@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s billions of dollars of tax “avoidance”, cheating, and simply not paying. Unfortunately, the wealthy who are calling the shots don’t really want to pay millions for IRS lawyers