• 1 Post
  • 208 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 25th, 2025

help-circle








  • Regarding point 1, its a factored in value already. Replacing multiple stages of production simultaneously is a massive risk - voice acting + editing + editor review + production review on the cut.

    This part:

    it’s entirely possible that they did, in fact, do quality review. Extensively. But at some point the generation costs exceeded their allowed budget and this is what they settled on.

    I’d call entirely likely.

    It would also mean that there was almost no testing of the llm’s output prior to pushing it to production work, or basic items like intonation would have been called out.

    Its also possible that the production team knew it was dogshit and pushed it out on purpose so people could see it for dogshit. Anime fans are not known for being supportive of poor adaptations after all, maybe they hoped for backlash? I know if I were on that team I’d prefer it.

    At some point I’d expect management to have recognized it for being terrible though.







  • You’re unduly expanding the scope of the argument.

    No, I’m contextualizing.

    leading cause

    Frequency, irrelevant.

    laws should be based in reality

    And in reality, murdering anyone based on who they are born as is an entirely different thing than anything else.

    The same is not true for men

    The same WHAT.

    You are referring to frequency. Repeatedly. I’m sorry, but either there is a fundamental language barrier at play, or I can only consider you as being incredibly exclusionary.

    The gender identity of the person should have zero bearing on this. The fact that its a crime based on hate of someone’s gender identity should.

    Thats it. Full stop.



  • Let’s try it this way.

    Hate crimes based on sexual orientation occur many times more often than those based on gender expression.

    By your logic, we don’t need hate crimes based on gender expression.

    Hate crimes based on sexual identity are drastically higher for black people than Hispanic or white people.

    By your logic we would only need to have hate crime legislation for sexual orientation of black people.

    Does that make more sense to you as to why I say a hate crime is a hate crime?

    You are saying that only the more frequent crimes require legislation.

    I am saying the particulars (sexual identity, gender, race) aren’t as relevant as the fact that its a hate-based crime. How often it happens doesnt matter. The fact that its based on hate is what matters.



  • That would only be true if there were a commensurate killings based on misandry.

    I would have to disagree. The quantity is irrelevant, the existence of the hate crime is all that really matters.

    I can understand what they are doing here (bringing attention to the rampant mysogony), but I do think that could have been done better by having it be a hate crime law with a definition on sex/gender as the motivation, but call it out or name it to address the rampant mysogony.

    But a hate crime is a hate crime, and should be treated as a hate crime regardless.

    Edit: Just to say, I don’t get the impression that what I suggested is the case here, but maybe I’m misinterpreting things. Feel free to point out if it addresses hate crimes based on identity more generally, I’d be happy to hear it. Doesnt seem to be the case from the article though.