Tbh I haven’t watched a single super bowl ever. So i didn’t care to watch the halftime show either. I just looked up how long the show was.

Lady gaga being part of it makes even funnier.

“For 13 minutes, my TV didn’t have white people in the screen. I am getting oppressed!!!” That idiot

Are you aware of any mail server or client that is not using encrypted channels by default?

Most of the internet, nowadays, is encrypted on transmission.

Some things are end-to-end encrypted, some things are only encrypted for transmission, and rarely (nowadays) things are not encrypted at all.

Emails are encrypted for transmission.

That means, your email is readable on your computer, on your email server, on their email server and on their computer. Your email is not readable by your router, their router, your ISP, their ISP, or anyone operating a machine over which the transmission happens.

There are end-to-end encryption for email but you would know if you would use it.

That wasn’t my point.

My point was “these women are not unidentified”. Which was the claim.

But classic move of your end.

Maybe there is a kind of beauty in the weirdness that you like.

I wasn’t talking about beauty as only visual beauty, but also the beauty of a kind soul. The beauty of the little flaws that make us.

A quick google search returned:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Yo_Jong https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choe_Son-hui https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyon_Song-wol

https://m.sedaily.com/NewsView/29UQSGPQJW

Original

Translated

As a man who currently plans to marry a woman that chooses to dress very modestly and doesn’t like tattoos, that woman looks great and beauty comes in many forms. Don’t be a fool and enjoy all beauty. The tree’s, the human’s, the music’s. Life is better if you allow yourself to enjoy “things” for their kind of beauty and not complain about the lack of some other kind.

Your implications dismissed it. You talked about how most abortion being done by choice, because you wanted to make the point that a man should have a choice too, ignoring the fact that a cis man when raped, can’t and will not be impregnated and will not experience the trauma of such a pregnancy. There is an imbalance in the comparison. Of course, it doesn’t end with rape but also simply the consequences of being pregnant, e.g. possibly depression. By pointing at the choice and demanding the same ability to choose, you equate both. They are not the same and you dismiss all the differences.

I am very certain being pregnant by your rapist and having to carry the child to terms would be increasing the trauma of the rape and aborting the child would consequently reduce the trauma. I mean either way you would have trauma but I am fairly certain it is reducing.

I am telling you to stop comparing to vastly different situations. That your comparison is bad because of it.

“If this was about women losing something that men aren’t already without, they might have the foundation of a point. But it’s still a fact that women haven’t really given a shit about advocating for giving men the equivalent rights, throughout the decades that they had them nationwide.”… “women haven’t really given a shit about advocating for giving men the equivalent rights”… jup… the focus of women’s lack of “giving a shit” surely doesn’t frame women in any way negatively… yeah… get real.

The normal changes that happen in pregnancy are not to ignore. And what about pregnancy through e.g. rape? Do we dismiss the mental harm it would cause to have a daily reminder that someone did that to you?

Stop comparing.

Just say, “i think there should be an opt-out option for men” and move on. You can’t compare pregnancy and it’s implications with simply parenthood, but you don’t need to. Just argue for what you want without punch down. Women are not your enemy. You can have more rights and they can have more rights.

There is quite a big difference between parenthood + possible life threatening situation + all the “normal” changes that are part of pregnancy; and parenthood.

If it would be purely about parenthood, you would have a point but it is not. And maybe a conversation about the ability to opt-out of parenthood should be had but the conversation about abortion rights is not about parenthood.

I strongly encourage you to inform yourself about the consequence of the recent changes of abortion rights in America. It is not about parenthood, but health care.

Edit: https://www.propublica.org/article/georgia-abortion-ban-amber-thurman-death a little starting point

Yup, we agree.

I would agree and disagree.

You are right but I think “ignoring” “men’s issues” harms the feministic cause and consequently the “dying of miscarriage” problem. As sad as it is PR is sometimes very important and e.g. the lie in the post doesn’t help the PR and a lot of young men don’t feel supported but attacked by the current framing of feminism.

I am also very supportive of women’s rights but lying is not helpful.

Honestly the point that it tries to make is not the point that it makes either. It could be understood as “let’s ban abortion everywhere”, and I don’t think that is the point that it tries to make.

I am in favor of bodily autonomy and I don’t care what the law currently is anywhere, it should be a given.

As an eu citizen, I am happy that we have full sovereignty; and choose to be part of the eu. One of the most stabilising forces (if not the most) in europe.

Until you miss a payment and they hit you with the fine for missing a payment.

THEY HAVE TO MAKE MONEY!

No. Their business model is literally currently failing.

People can’t afford to pay back. That is why they couldn’t afford saving for it. So the service provider will sit on bad debt until no one wants to leant them money anymore and they are bankrupt.

https://youtu.be/nu6C2KL_S9o

Thank you! Monica doesn’t deserve this.

Can we keep Monica out of trump x bubba jokes?