There will be times when the struggle seems impossible. Alone, unsure, dwarfed by the scale of the enemy. Freedom is a pure idea. It occurs spontaneously and without instruction. Random acts of insurrection are occurring constantly. There are whole armies, battalions that have no idea that they’ve already enlisted in the cause. And even the smallest act of insurrection pushes our lines forward. Tyranny requires constant effort. It breaks, it leaks. Authority is brittle. Oppression is the mask of fear.

  • 0 Posts
  • 629 Comments
Joined 3 年前
cake
Cake day: 2024年3月3日

help-circle


  • The Foundation book series doesn’t really start into psychic stuff until the second book, Foundation and Empire, with the Mule. Big turning point of the overall plot because of him. I wouldn’t classify the Second Foundation as psychics as much as having the ability to predict patterns mathematically and socially influence populations. The fourth book gets into some other psychic influencers.

    I’m okay with the TV show parts I’ve seen, but it is vastly different in its approach (and so more psychic type things going on). I knew a visual version would have to take a lot of liberties as the books just don’t translate well in the way they’re written.




  • Not developing AI. We’ve been working on and with ANI for a very long time, and constant research on what might make AGI possible. What side railed everything is some companies found out they can do lots of amazing things with LLMs, a subset of AI science, and investors will pay them to make better versions. They talk a lot about how what they’re doing will lead to AGI, but these people (or the scientists doing the actual work) know better than that. LLMs can possibly be part of what AGI uses, but it’s on the wrong branch. And they’ve given up following the other branches because this one is paying off.

    So in short, we could have done better (both ethically and core results), but once again money got in the way.


  • “15 days”

    It should have stayed a VP job. A leader delegates tasks to appropriate people. It’s funny how so many times those who are in power screw it up because they have to inject themselves into crap rather than surround themselves with experts and use their guidance to make decisions. Ego trip ruins what could have worked well.




  • I was trying to reply to this, bringing up the controversy that erupted when image generators were able to use prompts with artist names to simulate their style, and how that shows how blurry the copyright line is. As I wrote it, I realized how complicated the issue really is, and how little I understand current copyright laws. Some may argue there isn’t any vagueness, an artist’s work in any format is theirs and shouldn’t be copied for other use, training or otherwise. But we all use other people’s work in our own, don’t we? There is no solid line where one is ethical and one isn’t. Plagiarism without proper attribution has always been wrong, but if you take the same content and tweak it a bit, it’s not. LLMs can and do that, through statistical randomness, while using someone else’s material, just like human brains would.

    The compensation issue is definitely a problem and where the ethics come into play. Even if many people freely read a book in a library, it has been bought at some point. But how do you determine who was unfairly “stolen” from? Isn’t it basically everyone at this point?