And plenty that are not. What’s your point? Ban alcohol, cigarettes and sport bets?

I have a digital ID and use it all the time. What’s wrong with it?

That sucks but this is clearly a bug, not a performance issue.

No idea what it uses but I used on GrapheneOS without issues.

Trump says it’s a peace deal

Iran says it’s just a memorandum of understanding and they will have 60 days to negotiate the deal

Trump says they will sign it in the next 24h and the strait will be opened immediately

Iran says it will be signed Friday

Trump says there will be no tolls

Iran says they will control the passage

Iran and USA say the deal includes Lebanon

Israel is not commenting on it and bombs Beirut instead

Clusterfuck is the word.

(sorry, I didn’t realize ‘___’ render as single line)

Don’t give up!

PEDO -> P _ _ _

You never played wordle? None of those are 4 letter words.

No that P word. Hint:

P___

Moreover, they tricked the jury. Instead of trying them for terrorism, they try them for a small offense

Is this really that confusing? They were tried for criminal damage of property worth over $1m. That up to 10 years in prison. How is that a small offense?

The “terrorist connection” aggravating factor doesn’t change the maximum sentence, it only changes the conditions of parole. Everything you said is simply wrong. This is pure misinformation. The charges were not turned into anything. They are not charged with or sentenced for terrorism. Even if the aggravating factor was revealed before the trial the jury would still just be considering if they committed criminal damage.

They tried them under a minor offense. The jurors probably thought those convicted would get community service or a fine.

"Four Palestine Action activists have been found guilty of criminal damage "

"Corner was also found guilty of inflicting grievous bodily harm after striking Sgt Kate Evans twice with a sledgehammer, fracturing her spine. "

“An estimated £1m worth of damage was caused during the raid.”

“”"For damage over £5,000 or more serious cases:

Up to 10 years' imprisonment""""

Yes, the jury said they are guilty of a crime carrying up to 10 years of prison but thought they would just get a fine. Are you really that dense?

Trouble reading much?

Good thing you have nothing to say about it then.

I think you’re a bit confused here. It wasn’t me who proscribed Palestine Action as a terrorist group. UK government did. I just stated a fact here. Or was your comment addressed to the UK government? If so than I agree they suck.

What I am saying is that what you’re presenting as a slam dunk …isn’t

Except it is. We’re talking about some basic legal concepts here: charges, verdict, sentencing and aggravating factors. To claim that the judge withheld something from the jurors and applied additional charges after the verdict is simply a lie. He applied aggravating factors during the sentencing. Something the law clearly allows him to do in this case.

Now I’m sure some lawyers will argue that the whole concept of terrorist connection as aggravating factor is wrong but this is not what this post or articles claim. They claim something that is clearly false.

I’m also not talking who is and isn’t morally right. If you want to address what I’m talking here about (is terrorist connection additional charge or an aggravating factor?) then I’m happy to listen. If you want to talk about something else then please reply to someone else.

This argument makes no sense and only shows your total lack of understanding here.

It really is that simple. What is “terrorist connection”? Let’s see.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/crime-and-policing-act-2026-factsheets/crime-and-policing-act-2026-counter-terrorism-and-national-security-factsheet https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/58-01/129/5801129en.pdf

“”“The Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 introduced a requirement for courts to consider whether a ‘terrorist connection’ is an aggravating factor when sentencing for a specific set of non-terrorism offences.”“”

So is “terrorist connection” an offense? No. It’s an aggravating factor.

“”“any offence is capable of being subject to a finding or a determination of a terrorist connection, if the offence is not a terrorism offence and is punishable with a maximum sentence of more than 2 years”“”

“”“maximum sentence for criminal damage is 10 years”“”

It’s all as clear as it can be.

The offense is criminal damage. The jury said they are guilty. The sentence can be more than 2 years. The judge can consider terrorist connection as a aggravating factor. He did.

Jury is not involved in sentencing. Nothing was withheld.

“The fundamental principle is you should not be convicted on any statutory offence for which you have not been charged.”

You can argue that The Counter-Terrorism Act and the whole notion of “terrorist connection as an aggravating factor” is wrong and that only jury should be able to determine if someone has a connection to terrorist organization but you definitely can’t argue that the judge is adding some charges here without informing the jury. This is simply not what is happening. They are not even bending the rules here. They are doing exactly what the law allows them to do.

https://sentencingcouncil.org.uk/guidelines/offences-with-a-terrorist-connection-guidance/

This again…

It wasn’t a new charge. It was an aggravating factor.

It’s the opposite of mitigating factors (for those who are confused). Jury says that for example someone is guilty of robbery. That’s the charge and the verdict. Now the judge has to come up with the sentence and can apply mitigating factors like: it’s his first offense, he showed remorse, admitted guilt and apologized to the victim, hence I will not give him maximum possible sentence…

Aggravating factors work the other way. The judge can say “he used a deadly weapon and is repeat offender: maximum sentence”. Under UK law “terrorism connection” can be added as aggravating factor to any verdict. The judge added it here because Palestine Action is currently proscribed as a terrorist group under the Terrorism Act 2000.

Nothing was withheld from the jury, nothing was added to the charges. Those articles are simply lying about it.

They got hacked.

Use Debian. /s

it’s more like a bunch of community install scripts for stuff that isn’t officially supported yet - for popularity or other reasons.

I’m looking at the list of affected packages and many of them are in official debian repos. Isn’t the issue then that the official Arch repositories don’t have many packages and people have to use less secure sources? That still sounds like an Arch issue to me.